Strange - I had never realized that PostgreSQL would allow you to UPDATE a
primary key value.  I thought that other db's I had used (e.g. Sybase,
Oracle, SQL Server, etc.) in the past would not allow that, and you had to
DELETE, then INSERT to modify a row that needed a different primary key.

Of course, that is only for tables whose primary key meant something - no
reason to change a serial-type primary key that does not really mean
anything.

Susan


                                                                                
                                                          
                           Tom Lane                                             
                                                          
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            To:       Steven Brown 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                            
                           Sent by:                  cc:       
pgsql-general@postgresql.org                                               
                                                     Subject:  Re: [GENERAL] 
Changing ids conflicting with serial values?                 
                                                                                
                                                          
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]         |-------------------|           
                                                    
                      tgresql.org                     | [ ] Expand Groups |     
                                                          
                                                      |-------------------|     
                                                          
                                                                                
                                                          
                           11/02/2005 06:38                                     
                                                          
                      PM                                                        
                                                          
                                                                                
                                                          
                                                                                
                                                          




Steven Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I change an id (primary key serial) in a table, the next value
> returned by the sequence for the id can conflict with that id (e.g.,
> change the id to be id + 1).  MySQL seems to handle this transparently
> by skipping conflicting values, but with PostgreSQL I get primary key
> conflicts.  It seems rather bad if a user can modify an id in a row and
> cause failures for all future inserts - it's just too fragile.  What's
> the proper way to handle this in PostgreSQL?

Plan A: don't do that.  Why in the world is it a good idea to modify an
artificial primary key?  It's not like there's some external meaning to
the values.

Plan B: after you do it, adjust the sequence generator with setval().
You can use max() to figure out where to set the generator.

                                     regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simply protected storage solutions ensure that your information is
automatically safe, readily available and always there, visit us at 
http://www.overlandstorage.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to