On 12/21/05, Alexander Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the performance flow when trying to find out how many records
> are currently being stored in the table, I don't see how an index should
> help... Nevertheless we've created an unique index on "ID" but SELECT
> count("ID") from "XYZ" still takes 35 seconds*. (ID is the primary key
> basing on a sequence, select count(*) isn't faster.)
I would like to redirect you to the zillions of mailing list posts
about this subject :-).
> So - what kind of indexing would speed this up then?
None.
greetings,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Barbier
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
