[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Mikael Carneholm") writes:
>>"Built In" Failover/Clustering
>
>>This won't happen. The community stance, which is a good one is that
>>no single replication solutions fits everyone's needs and therefore
>>we rely out the outside sources. Slony-I, Mammoth Replicator and
>>pgpool being the most popular.
>
> Too bad - I think that will keep a lot of potential users from
> evaluating Pg as a serious alternative. Good or bad, decide for
> yourself :)Why on earth should that be? What serious alternative to PostgreSQL actually includes built-in failover or clustering? For Oracle, it is a separate add-on product licensed separately. Ditto for DB2. The same is likely the case for Informix and others. -- (format nil "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "cbbrowne" "acm.org") http://cbbrowne.com/info/x.html "Let's face it -- ASCII text is a far richer medium than most of us deserve." -- Scott McNealy ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
