On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:58:29AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is this what you're after? I don't know if there's another way.
>
> > role_user := current_setting('role');
>
> We currently define the spec's CURRENT_ROLE as equivalent to
> CURRENT_USER, but I wonder if it shouldn't do what Boris is after.
I wondered why there wasn't a SOME_THING that showed that. Does
the spec say anything about it? I just did a quick search and
didn't see anything but I might easily have overlooked it.
--
Michael Fuhr
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
