On Sunday March 26 2006 9:16 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see what appear to be many single transactions holding
> > RowExclusiveLocks for sometimes 40-50 seconds while their
> > query shows "<IDLE> in transaction".
> > ...
> > I'm thinking that means the client is simply tweaking a row
> > and then failing to commit the change for 40-50 seconds.  Is
> > that consistent?
>
> That's what it sounds like to me.  You might consider logging
> all commands from these clients for awhile so you can check
> that theory.

This indeed appears to be locking problem from within 
Apache::Session where it deletes a row from the DB but fails to 
commit the change for an extended period while another 
transaction waits on the same row.  Not sure how/why that's 
happening in the client code, but it's not a DB issue.

Thanks,
Ed

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to