Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I don't feel it's a questionable reading of the GPL at all. In fact,
> > >> it's pretty clear and I'm about 99% sure the FSF has commented on this
> > >> as well. It's true that it's unlikely anyone would actually sue Debian
> > >> over it but that doesn't somehow change what the licenses say.
> > >> Additionally, I think supporting GNUTLS would be a good thing for
> > >> Postgres to do even without this issue. I'd also like to see it support
> > >> SASL and a k5login-style user-controllable mapping.
> > >
> > > So, do GPL have this problem linking against OpenSSL as well?
> >
> > Yes, that's why GPL apps like Exim and Courier have explicit license
> > clauses permitting it.
>
> So, it's freeradius that needs the exception then, right?
Good morning Scott, would you like some coffee? :-)
- Tyler
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
