# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-05-29 08:10:43 -0400:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-05-28 16:13:20 -0400:
> >
> >>Basically we've got several different "states" that an item can be in.
> >>From what I've seen the way many places seem to deal with them is
> >>something along the lines of making bool values that act as
> >>switches...
> >>
> >>Ex:
> >>table items:
> >>item_id
> >>name
> >>description
> >>is_active
> >>is_sold_out
> >>is_banned
> >>
> >>Now we've started to see some problems with this sort of design.
> >>Namely we need to run sanity tests on every page that hits the items
> >>table to make sure is_active is true, is_sold_out is false, is_banned
> >>is false so on and so forth.  I was thinking of splitting up states
> >>into different tables ala...
> >>
> >>table items_active:
> >>item_active_id
> >>name
> >>description
> >>
> >>table items_sold_out:
> >>item_sold_out_id
> >>name
> >>description
> >
> >
> >    would views help?
> >
> >    CREATE VIEW items_to_sell AS
> >     SELECT item_id, name, description
> >     FROM items
> >     WHERE is_active = 1 AND is_sold_out = 0 AND is_banned = 0;
> 
> Views work for querying the chunks of data that match different states, 
> but if I was looking for information based on a single item_id wouldn't 
> I still need the sanity checks?

    No.

    SELECT *
    FROM items_to_sell
    WHERE item_id = 123

    will be transformed into something like

    SELECT item_id, name, description
    FROM items
    WHERE item_id = 123
    AND is_active = 1
    AND is_sold_out = 0
    AND is_banned = 0

-- 
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to