I like to make sure the vacuum takes place during off peak times, which
is why I don't use autovacuum.
Jim Nasby wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
I'm running a 8.0 database. I have a very large log table that is
rarely updated or deleted from. The nightly vacuum does not know
this, and spends a lot of time on it, and all its indexes.
My RFE: When vacuuming a table, pg should try to vacuum the primary
key first. If that results in 0 recovered entries, then assume the
table has no updates/deletes and skip the rest of that table. I'm
picking the primary key here, but any index that indexes each row of
the table will do. Maybe it should just pick the smallest index that
indexes each row of the table.
*shrug* It's kinda hard to get excited about that when running
autovacuum (or pg_autovacuum in the case of 8.0) would be a much better
solution.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
