Yes - this statement actually came from a helpful soul who had replied but did not realise I was talking about pltcl.
I am looking into the "unknown" command because I believe there may be security issues with using "spource" or "package" commands to access proc libraries - and that the "unknown" command and its magic tables is the way to make those libs reside on the server and totally portable. Am I correct? Carlo "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Ian Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> PLTCL was taken out of the core distribution, and is not in contrib. > > I think you confused pltcl with pgtcl. Totally different things > (pltcl is server side, pgtcl client side). > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
