On 8/4/06, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's believe that that was the real reason... :-)
If not, what was? Is this really a commentary on how many
"enterprise"-y types are using Postgres?
I'm afraid that many people read only the titles of abstract of news
(RSS-readers or diggers, etc) --> do not see that letter and that
words --> so they would think that this is a proof of that open-source
model is unworkable.
--
Best regards,
Nikolay
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
