On 8/4/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
BTW, difference vanishes due to expression power of SQL - it supports session comands in the same context as DDL commands and data manipulation stmts (SQL:200n, 4.33.2.5 'SQL-connection statements').
Sorry, I already see my failure. It is in the fact that Postgres doesn't support that connection statements yet (but some connection things are supported - like changing the CURRENT_ROLE). So, my previous message is interesting only from theoretical point of view. I always try to thing in the manner of SQL standard or use knowledge from books/university ... But the logic is clear, isn't it? Connection is not client operation. I think that Rafal's proposal is quite interesting (I experience the same difficulties every time. There was several wrong DROP DATABASE in my career... :-) ) -- Best regards, Nikolay ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
