Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
While all the talk of a hinting system over in hackers and perform is
good, and I have a few queries that could live with a simple hint system
pop up now and again, I keep thinking that a query planner that learns
>from its mistakes over time is far more desirable.
Is it reasonable or possible for the system to have a way to look at
query plans it's run and look for obvious mistakes its made, like being
off by a factor of 10 or more in estimations, and slowly learn to apply
its own hints?
Technically it is very feasible. But I think you might want to check US
Patent 6,763,359 before you start writing any code.
I think it would be a very good idea if you guys stopped looking at the
US patent database. It does no good to anyone. There's no way we can
avoid stomping on a patent or another -- there are patents for everything.
Hasn't IBM release a pile of it's patents for use (or at least stated
they won't sue) to OSS projects? If so, is this patent covered by that
"amnesty"?
Simply ignoring patents because "there is a patent for everything" is a
recipe for disaster. Companies like MS are running out of ways to tear
open OSS and they are certainly not above (below?) suing the heck out of
OSS projects for patent infringement.
What's needed is reform in the USPO. Call you congress (wo)man and
complain, but don't flaunt the law; you will lose.
Madi
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
