I am having some query problems on a table with large text fields.
The table contains 6.7M rows. It is vacuumed every night, and since the
last vacuum, rows have been inserted only, never updated or deleted.
There are many large text field values in one text field, some in excess
of 6MB.
I have another table with 13.8M rows, several times as many columns, but
no large text values.
I am testing select count() queries on both tables, counting on an
integer field only. The first table takes almost 300 seconds to
complete, while the second table takes about 90 seconds.
Why would very large text values effect the speed of a seq scan that
does not actually evaluate those values?
Oh, PG 8.1.3 on FC 5, 64-bit.
TIA
-Glen Parker
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
