On 10/31/06, Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:31 -0800, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
> I heard that reiser4 is not yet stable. And that there is a chance
> that it wont be since its author is in detention.
Here are the links:
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/10/15/0057203.shtml
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/10/11/0142216.shtml?tid=123
Also, SuSE announced that they will be switching to ext3 in their next
SLES releases:
http://news.com.com/Novell+makes+file-storage+software
+shift/2100-1016_3-6125509.html
Red Hat, major player in Enterprise game, is supporting ext* for years.
reiserfs is not enabled by default.
So, IMHO, since less people will be using reiser, I would not use that
in my installations.
> Most of the recommendations that I've seen are to use
> good-old-reliable EXT3 which keeps your data safe
Also ext2 is preferred on many installations, especially when people
want to avoid journals.
If i was a betting man, I would guess that (currently being developed)
ext4 will win the filesystem popularity contest at some point in the
future, and will probably dominate enterprise linux installations.
merlin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
