On fim, 2006-12-07 at 11:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In response to Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Of course they are able to complete, but the point is that they would
> >> not remove the tuples that would be visible to that idle open
> >> transaction.
>
> > I would expect that, but the OP claimed that vacuum full waited until
> > the other transaction was finished.
>
> No, she didn't claim that. As far as I see she was just complaining
> about the failure to remove dead tuples:
>
> > > > > If I have a running transaction in database1 and try to vacuum
> > > > > database2 but the dead tuples in database2 cannot be removed.
well actually, there was also this:
On fim, 2006-12-07 at 00:57 +0100, Cornelia Boenigk wrote:
> Hi Bill
>
> > Can you run a "vacuum
> > full", and does it reclaim the space?
>
> I tried but it hangs.
and also this:
On fim, 2006-12-07 at 01:03 +0100, Cornelia Boenigk wrote:
>
> as soon as I committed the open transaction the hangig vacuum full
> completed and the table was vacuumed:
gnari
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
