Ben wrote:
When you insert a tuple, it needs to be inserted into the index, yes.
There
is no way an insert can cause a sequential scan, except by some trigger
defined on the table.
Actually, as it happens, there *is* a trigger defined on the table to
fire before insert, but it too uses an index scan, at least according to
explain. Though, you'd think if it actually was using an index scan,
that would be showing up in pg_stat_user_tables, which it isn't. Might
the fact that the trigger is a plpgsql function be throwing it off and
keeping it from using more recent planner stats?
The query-plan for the function will be compiled first time it is
called. From that point on, it is fixed. It seems that is the source of
your seq-scans.
You can use the EXECUTE statement to construct a dynamic version of the
query, which will be planned every time it is run.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
