Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, that would mean an ANALYZE got done on template0, no? ... but
> AFAICT process_whole_db() always sets analyze=false.
The thing that's bothering me is that I don't see any certainty that
template0 is only processed via the process_whole_db() path. In the
8.1 code, the existence of a stats-collector DB entry causes a DB
to enter the normal round-robin processing path ... and I'm wondering
whether the mere act of autovac connecting due to process_whole_db()
doesn't cause such an entry to come into existence. IOW once template0
has been vacuumed once for anti-wraparound, it starts receiving normal
vacuums, which will cause their own XIDs to appear in pg_statistic
at least, and then you're at risk: if autovacuuming stops for awhile,
those XIDs will fall below the pg_clog horizon because template0 is
not considered when determining the cutoff.
8.2's approach is saner but I think we need some sort of band-aid
in the 8.1 branch...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
