Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can.
> Perhaps we should switch down the DEBUG level of it, at least until we
> know what happens?
That would have to wait on another update release, or at least someone
being willing to build a nonstandard executable for Windows, so let's
first see if people are willing to do the DEBUG5 bit.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
