On 6/2/07, Jasbinder Singh Bali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/2/07, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2007, at 11:08 , Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote: > > > Whats so novel about postgresql here? > > This would happen in any RDBMS. right? > > You induced divide by zero exception that crashed the whole > > transaction and it did not create the table bar? > > [Please don't top-post. It makes the discussion hard to follow.] > > I used the divide by zero to raise an error to show that both the > CREATE TABLE and the INSERT were rolled back when the transaction > failed. If there's another definition of transactional DDL, I'd like > to know what it is. > > Michael Glaesemann > grzm seespotcode net This is what happens in every RDBMS. Whats so special about postgres then?
Exactly. this seems like proving the ACIC property of a database thats true for every RDBMS. Whats so different in postgresql then?
