On 03/04/2026 16:03, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 10:15 PM Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> wrote:
I think the release notes should "nudge" all the
users who use non-default max_locks_per_transaction to increase it if
they see "out of memory" errors. I don't think it should provide a
blanket advise to double their locks

How about:

"If you had previously set max_locks_per_transaction, you might need to
set it to a higher value in v19 to avoid "out of shared memory" errors.
If you are unsure what to set it to and don't mind the increased memory
usage, you can double the value to ensure that you can acquire at least
as many locks as before"

The wiggle room is 100KB fixed + 10% of other two structures, so value
by which it should be increased is partly fixed and partly a multiple
of current value. "double the value" is simplest advice we can give.
+1.

Ok, committed these patches to remove the safety margins, make LOCK and PROCLOCK fixed-size, and change the default to max_locks_per_transaction=128. I will do one final self-review of the remaining earlier patches from this thread next; I believe they're ready to be committed too.

Thanks for the review!

- Heikki



Reply via email to