On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 7:28 AM Sami Imseih <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1. I think it might be better to mention this in the documentation to > > make the behavior explicit. What do you think about stating that an > > anti-wraparound autovacuum does not perform an ANALYZE, like in the > > attached patch? > > +1 to the additional documentation. > > a small nit: We can just say "skipped" and not "still skipped".
Thanks, I've fixed it. -- Best regards, Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
v3-0001-remove-autoanalyze-corner-case.patch
Description: Binary data
