Hi, On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 9:04 AM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I see your point. I agree that using wal_receiver_status_interval for > this test may not be a reliable way. Can we attempt using > pg_wal_replay_pause() on standby and then checking > wait_event=WaitForStandbyConfirmation with backend_type=walsender on > primary? Or do you see any issues in this approach that I might be > overlooking? >
Yes, I think we can make use of the WAL replay pause/resume mechanism. This seems like the right approach, as it gives us a more controlled and deterministic way to validate the lagging behavior. -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma.
