On 2026-04-15 We 12:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes:
On 2026-04-15 We 10:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
The OpenBSD members of the buildfarm don't seem to like this.
Ugh.
I'm will take a look later today.
I reproduced it locally on OpenBSD 7.7.  HAVE_SA_SIGINFO is defined,
and the code to grab the pid/uid out of siginfo_t is definitely
getting compiled.  As best I can tell, the kernel is simply passing
zero for info->si_pid and si_uid.  This does not match up with the
info available on the net, so I'm not sure what the issue is.

Some googling suggested that on some platforms si_pid will be zero
if the process signaled itself, but I can eliminate that theory:
it's still zero if I do the pg_terminate_backend() from another
session.

As a short-term fix, we could just go back to allowing the regex to
consider the match optional.

                        


Ok, so we can get the buildfarm green I'll go and do that. But I think we should have an open item to tighten the test.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com



Reply via email to