On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 02:50:53PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > This patch removes six lines of code and adds none. There are four > messages on the thread. We've done 14 complete CI runs. That might be > an extreme example, but I just don't know if repeatedly running CI on > small patches that aren't being actively updated is really what we > want to be doing.
Yes, starting with a low threshold should have little impact. I suspect that we could take it slow, say by testing much less patches that have a max of N lines touched (20~50?), and shave in resource usage. This would not change much how useful the information provided is. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
