On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 2:30 PM Matheus Alcantara <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/04/26 08:24, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >>> +-- An index created directly on a partition has no parent in the > >>> partitioned > >>> +-- index tree; merge must ignore such indexes (they disappear with the > >>> old > >>> +-- partition). > >>> +CREATE INDEX part_extdep_3_extra_idx ON part_extdep_3(x); > >>> +ALTER TABLE part_extdep MERGE PARTITIONS (part_extdep_merged, > >>> part_extdep_3) > >>> + INTO part_extdep_merged2; > >>> +SELECT relname FROM pg_class > >>> +WHERE relname LIKE 'part_extdep_merged2%idx' ORDER BY relname; > >> > >> Looks like this test is also redundant? This does not test new DEPENDS ON > >> logic. > > > > I've added the dependency on this index to check index disappears with > > its dependency. I think this would make this test more relevant. > > > > Kirill, Matheus, are you ok with these change? > > > It works for me.
Thank you, pushed! ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
