Hi, Thanks for the detailed explanation.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 10:24 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Kamura-san, > > > For the reasons above, I would like to proceed with the policy of > treating > > this as a syntax error. > > Make sense, so the v1 patch is usable as-is. It looks good to me. > > > Handling this as a syntax error seems like a reasonable and consistent approach, especially given the undefined behavior and alignment with other systems like Pro*C. The proposed patch looks good to me. Regards, Lakshmi G
