On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 08:05:00AM +0800, Mingwei Jia wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for the clarification, and sorry for the noise. > > Attached is a tar.gz archive containing the 10 patch files as a single > attachment, as suggested. > > The archive contains: > > umbra-rfc-v2-patches/0001-... > ... > umbra-rfc-v2-patches/0010-... > > This is the same RFC v2 patch set as before; only the delivery format is > changed. > > SHA256: > > 2b47ef8e77d1860a2f652cc86a5d030f0bcbc466d5f0fbbf515b20b55835c4b7
Yes, I think that worked; the email had two parts, and the second part was labeled correctly: I 1 <no description> [text/plain, 8bit, utf-8, 0.4K] A 2 umbra-rfc-v2-patches.tar.gz [applica/x-gzip, base64, 316K] -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
