On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 06:53:58PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 04/09/2026 22:30, Tom Lane wrote: >> Well, you have a point. There's pretty nearly nothing that's >> well-designed about CREATE SCHEMA subcommands: as you say, the syntax >> is shaky, and the namespace visible to subcommands is unclear, and >> the whole business of re-ordering subcommands is debatable, and even >> if all those things were fixed the benefit of the entire feature is >> marginal. So maybe we should just say that our legacy implementation >> is what it is and we will mark it deprecated rather than putting any >> effort into improving it. I'd like to see more than one vote in favor >> of that before I do it, though. > > Reverting seems like the safest thing to do. This is a really niche thing, > but whatever behavior we pick, we'll be stuck with it for a long time. If > we're not 100% certain about the new behavior, better to take a step back > and discuss and design it with more time.
+1 -- nathan
