Hi shihao, On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 10:16 AM shihao zhong <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Xuneng, > > Thanks for v10 and for finding the lock case. I tested it and have > a few notes. > > 1. I am able to reproduce the case with your code and when > it passed deadlock_timeout. And your V10 is able to cancel the > deadlocked query. > > 2. V10 leaves the case where the delay has already passed as it was, > one wait with no timeout. So the problem in CF 6445 [1] is still > there. > > I think this patch is LGTM. > > [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6445/ > Thanks for your review! I am aware of the patch you referred to and plan to take a look soon. -- Regards, Xuneng Zhou HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
