Hi, Thanks for your review comments/suggestions.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 5:15 PM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 7:15 PM Ashutosh Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the review and suggestions. I agree that we can verify > > these changes by adding log checks to the existing TAP test for > > two-phase transactions. I’ve done that in the attached patch, which is > > based on the changes suggested in your earlier patch. Please take a > > look and let me know if you have any other comments. > > Thanks for updating the patch! > > - ereport(LOG, > + ereport(DEBUG1, > > Do we want to keep this debug message translatable? If not, we could > simplify this to elog(). > > Also, DEBUG2 might be more consistent with per-transaction messages > in PrepareRedoAdd() and PrepareRedoRemoveFull()? Those use elog(DEBUG2, ...). > This would also avoid flooding the log at DEBUG1. > It's a developer-facing message, so I agree that it doesn't need to be translatable. I've changed it to elog(DEBUG2, ...) in the attached patch, consistent with PrepareRedoAdd() and PrepareRedoRemoveFull(). -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma.
v3-0001-Reduce-logging-during-prepared-transaction-recovery.patch
Description: Binary data
