pgsql-hackers  

Messages by Thread

• [PATCH] Add error hints for invalid COPY options Sugamoto Shinya
• Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify Tom Lane
• Adjust comments for `IndexOptInfo` to accurately reflect indexcollations's length Junwang Zhao
• Re: proposal: plpgsql, new check for extra_errors - strict_expr_check Pavel Stehule
• Fix logical decoding not track transaction during SNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT ocean_li_996
  • Re:Fix logical decoding not track transaction during SNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT ocean_li_996
  • Re: Fix logical decoding not track transaction duringSNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT cca5507
  • Re: Fix logical decoding not track transaction duringSNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT ocean_li_996
  • Re: Fix logical decoding not track transaction during SNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT cca5507
  • Re:Fix logical decoding not track transaction during SNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT ocean_li_996
• [BUG] Incorrect historic snapshot may be serialized to disk during fast-forwarding cca5507
  • Re:[BUG] Incorrect historic snapshot may be serialized to disk during fast-forwarding ocean_li_996
  • Re: [BUG] Incorrect historic snapshot may be serialized to disk during fast-forwarding cca5507
  • Re:Re: [BUG] Incorrect historic snapshot may be serialized to disk during fast-forwarding ocean_li_996
• Do not emit WAL record for FSM truncaton when unneeded. Kirill Reshke
• Missing wait events (gap analysis) Nikolay Samokhvalov
• Re: meson and check-tests Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: meson and check-tests Nazir Bilal Yavuz
• [PATCH] Reorganize pqcomm.h a bit Jacob Champion
  • Re: [PATCH] Reorganize pqcomm.h a bit Jelte Fennema-Nio
  • Re: [PATCH] Reorganize pqcomm.h a bit Jacob Champion
  • Re: [PATCH] Reorganize pqcomm.h a bit Jacob Champion
  • Re: [PATCH] Reorganize pqcomm.h a bit Jelte Fennema-Nio
• Optimize cardinality estimation when unique keys are fully covered feichanghong
  • Re: Optimize cardinality estimation when unique keys are fully covered feichanghong
  • Re: Optimize cardinality estimation when unique keys are fully covered Tom Lane
  • Re: Optimize cardinality estimation when unique keys are fully covered Nico Williams
  • Re: Optimize cardinality estimation when unique keys are fully covered feichanghong
• Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes Matthias van de Meent
• more C99 cleanup Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: more C99 cleanup Thomas Munro
  • Re: more C99 cleanup Tom Lane
  • Re: more C99 cleanup Tom Lane
• Segmentation fault on proc exit after dshash_find_or_insert Rahila Syed
• Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec Bertrand Drouvot
  • Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec Michael Paquier
  • Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec Chao Li
  • Re: Remove unused fields from BufferCacheNumaRec Michael Paquier
• change default default_toast_compression to lz4? Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: change default default_toast_compression to lz4? Aleksander Alekseev
  • Re: change default default_toast_compression to lz4? Daniel Gustafsson
  • Re: change default default_toast_compression to lz4? Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: change default default_toast_compression to lz4? Andres Freund
  • Re: change default default_toast_compression to lz4? Tom Lane
• headerscheck ccache support Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: headerscheck ccache support Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: headerscheck ccache support Andres Freund
  • Re: headerscheck ccache support Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: headerscheck ccache support Andres Freund
  • Re: headerscheck ccache support Thomas Munro
• Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed inBUILDING_SNAPSHOT state cca5507
• [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ... Ian Lawrence Barwick
  • Re: [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ... Neil Chen
  • Re: [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ... Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
• [PATCH] Remove ctid from self-join examples in UPDATE and DELETE docs Bernice Southey
• RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support * Neustradamus *
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Heikki Linnakangas
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Heikki Linnakangas
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • [oauth] SASL mechanisms Jacob Champion
  • Re: [oauth] SASL mechanisms Nico Williams
  • Re: [oauth] SASL mechanisms Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support * Neustradamus *
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support * Neustradamus *
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Jacob Champion
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Daniel Gustafsson
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support * Neustradamus *
  • Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support Nico Williams
• [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Greg Burd
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB barriers Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB barriers Greg Burd
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB barriers Nathan Bossart
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB barriers Dave Cramer
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB barriers Greg Burd
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Andres Freund
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Andres Freund
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Greg Burd
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Greg Burd
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Thomas Munro
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Greg Burd
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ​barriers Greg Burd
• Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes) Greg Burd
  • Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes) Andres Freund
  • Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes) Melanie Plageman
• Re: Odd openbsd CI failure Melanie Plageman
• Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent Robert Haas
  • Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent Nathan Bossart
  • Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent Robert Haas
  • Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent Nathan Bossart
  • Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent Robert Haas
  • Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent Nathan Bossart
• Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) Ashutosh Bapat
• Re: Metadata and record block access stats for indexes Mircea Cadariu
  • Re: Metadata and record block access stats for indexes Aleksander Alekseev
• Remove useless casts to (void *) Bertrand Drouvot
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Aleksander Alekseev
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Bertrand Drouvot
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Aleksander Alekseev
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Bertrand Drouvot
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Jacob Champion
  • Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) Peter Eisentraut
• Re: [PATCH] Expose checkpoint timestamp and duration in pg_stat_checkpointer Álvaro Herrera
• RE: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE Aya Iwata (Fujitsu)
• Unexpected flood or keepalive messages during logical replication Petros Angelatos
• 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Tom Lane
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Tom Lane
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 David Rowley
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 David Rowley
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 David Rowley
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Daniel Gustafsson
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Daniel Gustafsson
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Aleksander Alekseev
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Aleksander Alekseev
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Aleksander Alekseev
  • Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 Bruce Momjian
• Avoid unnecessary processing of DISTINCT clause (Was: Unique Keys) Antonin Houska
• Re: pgsql: doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots Robert Haas
  • Re: pgsql: doc: remove verbiage about "receiving" data from rep. slots Bruce Momjian
• Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Heikki Linnakangas
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Yuefei Shi
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Neil Chen
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Tom Lane
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Neil Chen
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Chao Li
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Heikki Linnakangas
  • Re: Use strtoi64() in pgbench, replacing its open-coded implementation Álvaro Herrera
• PG17 version getting installed by default with every package installation Rambabu V
• Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Thomas Munro
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Thomas Munro
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Álvaro Herrera
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Jacob Champion
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Thomas Munro
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Thomas Munro
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Nazir Bilal Yavuz
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Thomas Munro
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Peter Eisentraut
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Thomas Munro
  • Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) Tom Lane
• Re: [PATCH] Fixed creation of empty .log files during log rotation Laurenz Albe
  • Re: [PATCH] Fixed creation of empty .log files during log rotation Tom Lane
• Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Akshat Jaimini
  • Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query torikoshia
  • Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Robert Haas
  • Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query torikoshia
  • Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query Robert Haas
• Post-release followup: pg_add_size_overflow() Jacob Champion
  • Re: Post-release followup: pg_add_size_overflow() Chao Li
  • Re: Post-release followup: pg_add_size_overflow() Jacob Champion
  • Re: Post-release followup: pg_add_size_overflow() Michael Paquier
  • Re: Post-release followup: pg_add_size_overflow() Jacob Champion
• Re: pg_recvlogical: Prevent flushed data from being re-sent after restarting replication Mircea Cadariu
  • Re: pg_recvlogical: Prevent flushed data from being re-sent after restarting replication Mircea Cadariu
  • Re: pg_recvlogical: Prevent flushed data from being re-sent after restarting replication Fujii Masao
  • Re: pg_recvlogical: Prevent flushed data from being re-sent after restarting replication Mircea Cadariu
• Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Fujii Masao
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Fujii Masao
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Fujii Masao
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Chao Li
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Fujii Masao
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Chao Li
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Fujii Masao
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Chao Li
  • Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect Fujii Masao
• IS JSON predicate support for domain base type as JSON/JSONB/BYTEA/TEXT jian he
  • Re: IS JSON predicate support for domain base type as JSON/JSONB/BYTEA/TEXT Tom Lane
• *_LAST in enums to define NUM* macross Roman Khapov
  • Re: *_LAST in enums to define NUM* macross Tom Lane

• Earlier messages