On 20 November 2017 at 18:49, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > David CARLIER <devne...@gmail.com> writes: > > - Reducing OpenBSD postfgresql maintainer internal changes bookeeping if > > those small changes make sense for the PostgreSQL developers. > > Hm. The s_lock.c change is surely fine if OpenBSD maintainers say it is. > > Not sure about adding Motorola 88K support to s_lock.h ... is anybody > really still interested in that platform?
Yes there is :-) > OTOH, we still have M68K > and VAX stanzas in that file, so I suppose it's silly to complain > about 88K. A bigger issue is that I wonder whether that code has > ever been tested: it does not look to me like the __asm__ call is > even syntactically correct. There should be colons in it. > > True :-) corrected. Thanks. > regards, tom lane >
0001-PATCH-1-1-Porting-OpenBSD-internal-changes.patch
Description: Binary data
