On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> ... Would you think >> that it is acceptable to add the number of index scans that happened >> with the verbose output then? > > I don't have an objection to it, but can't you tell that from VACUUM > VERBOSE already? There should be a "INFO: scanned index" line for > each scan.
Of course, sorry for the noise. -- Michael
