On 11/13/2017 12:32 PM, Mark Rofail wrote:
== The @>> operator I would argue that allocating an array of datums and building an array would have the same complexityI am not sure what you mean here. Just because something has the same complexity does not mean there can't be major performance differences.I have spend a lot of time working on this operator and would like to benefit from it. How should I go about this ? Start a new patch ?
I am still not sure what you mean here. Feel free to add @>> to this patch if you like. You may want to submit it as two patch files (but please keep them as the same commitfest entry) but I leave that decision all up to you.
So the two main issues we remain to resolve are MATCH FULL and the RI_Initial_Check() query refactoring. The problem is that I am not one of the original authors and have not touched this part of the code. I understand the problem but it will take some time for me to understand how to resolve everything.
Cool, feel free to ask if you need some assistance. I want this patch. Andreas
