On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Oliver Ford <ojf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Erikjan Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> SELECT pg_get_viewdef('v_window');
>> ! pg_get_viewdef
>> ! ----------------------------------------------
>> ! SELECT i.i, +
>> ! sum(i.i) OVER (ORDER BY i.i) AS sum_rows+
>> FROM generate_series(1, 10) i(i);
>> (1 row)
>>
>> --- 1034,1043 ----
>> (10 rows)
>>
>> SELECT pg_get_viewdef('v_window');
>> ! pg_get_viewdef
>> !
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ! SELECT i.i,
>> +
>> ! sum(i.i) OVER (ORDER BY i.i ROWS BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING)
>> AS sum_rows+
>> FROM generate_series(1, 10) i(i);
>> (1 row)
>>
>>
>> This small hickup didn't prevent building an instance but obviously I
>> haven't done any real tests yet.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>
>> Erik Rijkers
>
> After another clone and rebuild it works alright with the correct
> spacing on mine, so the attached v2 should all pass. I noticed that I
> hadn't added the exclusions clauses to the view defs code, so that's
> also in this patch with extra tests to cover it.Sorry previous patch was in full-commit form and not just a diff. Attached is it in bare diff form.
0001-window-frame-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
