On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The patch still applies (with some hunks). I have added it in CF [1] >> to avoid losing track. >> >> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1341/ > > This did not get reviews and the patch still applies. I am moving it to next > CF.
I'd like to break this into two patches, one to fix the general background worker problems and another to fix the problems specific to parallel query. The attached version extracts the two fixes for general background worker problems from Amit's patch and adjust the comments a bit more extensively than he did. Barring objections, I'll commit and back-patch this; then we can deal with the other part of this afterward. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
bgworker-startup.patch
Description: Binary data
