On 2017-12-18 12:43:24 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > This is the behavior I was expecting. As I said, I may have misunderstood > the responses but it is acting as I would expect.
Just ot make sure: You're saying there's no problem here, and that logical rep is behaving correctly, right? FWIW, I wonder if we need to add a warning somewhere about FULL replication, given it's essentially O(#changes * #rows) -> O(n^2) for updating the whole table. Greetings, Andres Freund
