Hi Sawada-san,

> Thank you for quick response. The changes look good to me. But I wonder
> if the following changes needs some comments to describe what each checks
> does for.
> 
> -    if (errarg->attnum < 0)
> +    if (errarg->local_attnum <0)
> +        return;
> +
> +    rel = errarg->rel;
> +    remote_attnum = rel->attrmap[errarg->local_attnum];
> +
> +    if (remote_attnum < 0)
>          return;

Thanks, I have added some comments as you mentioned.


---
Thanks and best regards,
Dang Minh Huong
NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd.
http://www.nec-solutioninnovators.co.jp/en/

Attachment: fix_slot_store_error_callback_v10.patch
Description: fix_slot_store_error_callback_v10.patch

Reply via email to