On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:37:22AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I have redone my set of previous tests and can confirm that PQhost is > behaving as I would expect it should, and those results are the same as > yours.
if (conn->connhost != NULL &&
- conn->connhost[conn->whichhost].type != CHT_HOST_ADDRESS)
+ conn->connhost[conn->whichhost].host != NULL &&
+ conn->connhost[conn->whichhost].host[0] != '\0')
return conn->connhost[conn->whichhost].host;
- else if (conn->pghost != NULL && conn->pghost[0] != '\0')
- return conn->pghost;
Upon further review, the second bit of the patch is making me itching. I
think that you should not remove the second check which returns
conn->pghost if a value is found in it.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
