On 1/19/18 16:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > If the only problem is that buildfarm would run tests twice, then I > think we should just press forward with this regardless of that: it > seems a chicken-and-egg problem, because buildfarm cannot be upgraded to > use some new test method if the method doesn't exist yet. As a > solution, let's just live with some run duplication for a period until > the machines are upgraded to a future buildfarm client code.
Well, people protested against that approach. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
