On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Greetings, > > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut >> >> <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >>> On 8/8/17 05:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote: >> >>>> Are you planning to work on remaining patches 0005 and 0006 that >> >>>> improve the subscription codes in PG11 cycle? If not, I will take over >> >>>> them and work on the next CF. >> >>> >> >>> Based on your assessment, the remaining patches were not required bug >> >>> fixes. So I think preparing them for the next commit fest would be >> >>> great. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you for the comment. >> >> >> >> After more thought, since 0001 and 0003 patches on the first mail also >> >> improve the subscription codes and are worth to be considered, I >> >> picked total 4 patches up and updated them. I'm planning to work on >> >> these patches in the next CF. >> >> >> > >> > Added this item to the next commit fest. >> >> The patch set fails to apply. Please provide a rebased version. I am >> moving this entry to next CF with waiting on author as status. > > Masahiko Sawada, this patch is still in Waiting on Author and hasn't > progressed in a very long time. Is there any chance you'll be able to > provide an updated patch soon for review? Or should this patch be > closed out? >
Thank you for notification. Since it seems to me that no one is interested in this patch, it would be better to close out this patch. This patch is a refactoring patch but subscription code seems to work fine so far. If a problem appears around subscriptions, I might propose it again. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
