On Wednesday, January 24, 2018, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > This does not go all the way towards making pg_restore's item selection > switches dump subsidiary objects the same as pg_dump would, because > pg_restore doesn't really have enough info to deal with indexes and > table constraints the way pg_dump does. Perhaps we could intuit the > parent table by examining object dependencies, but that would be a > bunch of new logic that seems like fit material for a different patch. > In the meantime I just added a disclaimer to pg_restore.sgml explaining > this. >
Unless we really wanted to keep prior-version compatibility it would seem more reliable to have pg_dump generate a new TOC entry type describing these dependencies and have pg_restore read and interpret them during selective restore mode. Basically a cross-referencing "if you restore A also restore B". Where A can only be tables and B indexes and constraints (if we can get away with it being that limited initially). David J.
