Hi, >From what I see some time ago the write lifetime hints support for NVMe multi streaming was merged into Linux kernel [1]. Theoretically it allows data written together on media so they can be erased together, which minimizes garbage collection, resulting in reduced write amplification as well as efficient flash utilization [2]. I couldn't find any discussion about that on hackers, so I decided to experiment with this feature a bit. My idea was to test quite naive approach when all file descriptors, that are related to temporary files, have assigned `RWH_WRITE_LIFE_SHORT`, and rest of them `RWH_WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME`. Attached patch is a dead simple POC without any infrastructure around to enable/disable hints.
It turns out that it's possible to perform benchmarks on some EC2 instance
types (e.g. c5) with the corresponding version of the kernel, since they expose
a volume as nvme device:
```
# nvme list
Node SN Model
Namespace Usage Format FW Rev
---------------- --------------------
---------------------------------------- ---------
-------------------------- ---------------- --------
/dev/nvme0n1 vol01cdbc7ec86f17346 Amazon Elastic Block Store
1 0.00 B / 8.59 GB 512 B + 0 B 1.0
```
To get some baseline results I've run several rounds of pgbench on these quite
modest instances (dedicated, with optimized EBS) with slightly adjusted
`max_wal_size` and with default configuration:
$ pgbench -s 200 -i
$ pgbench -T 600 -c 2 -j 2
Analyzing `strace` output I can see that during this test there were some
significant number of operations with pg_stat_tmp and xlogtemp, so I assume
write lifetime hints should have some effect.
As a result I've got reduction of latency about 5-8% (but so far these numbers
are unstable, probably because of virtualization).
```
# without patch
number of transactions actually processed: 491945
latency average = 2.439 ms
tps = 819.906323 (including connections establishing)
tps = 819.908755 (excluding connections establishing)
```
```
with patch
number of transactions actually processed: 521805
latency average = 2.300 ms
tps = 869.665330 (including connections establishing)
tps = 869.668026 (excluding connections establishing)
```
So I have a few questions:
* Does it sound interesting and worthwhile to create a proper patch?
* Maybe someone else has similar results?
* Any suggestions about what can be the best/worst case scenarios of using such
kind of hints?
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c75b1d9421f80f4143e389d2d50ddfc8a28c8c35
[2]:
https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/09/23/0_storage-intelligence-prodoverview-2015-0.pdf
nvme_write_lifetime_poc.patch
Description: Binary data
