On 7 February 2018 at 15:25, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you plan to press forward with this, then, or what's > the next step? >
Yes, I think the results are pretty good so far, especially for the more non-uniform distributions. AFAICS it solves the 2 original complaints, and I've not yet seen a case where it makes things worse. I plan to do more testing (and if anyone else wants to, that would be most welcome), and then barring any unexpected issues/objections, I'll commit it. Probably not this week though. Regards, Dean
