Hi David, On 07/02/18 18:31, David Steele wrote:
> This proposal is still in need of review and hasn't really gotten it in > the last few CFs. Agreed. > Since the feature does not seem like a good fit for the last CF of PG11 > I am marking it Returned with Feedback. Is there any chance that it may be still resubmitted / reopened for the March CF? Actually right now I am in the process of reviewing it, for it would be really useful for my "OUZO" project (a fork of the RUM access method). One general comment I can already make is that enabling compression should be made optional, which appears to be a small and easy addition to the generic WAL API. Best regards, -- Markus Nullmeier http://www.g-vo.org German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory (GAVO)
