Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 01:46:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I pushed a fix for all that.
> Shouldn't there be a test case as well? There was one for the premature-free issue in d02d4a6d4. I didn't really see a need for an explicit test for the subselect issue. > This brings the amount of objects stored in pg_proc to four. Perhaps it > would be time to bring more clarity in pg_proc by introducing a prokind > column for functions, aggregates, window functions and procedures? Yeah. I was under the impression that Peter was looking into that ... [ digs... ] see https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/80ee1f5c-fa9d-7285-ed07-cff53d4f4...@2ndquadrant.com regards, tom lane
