On 2/11/18 23:14, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2018-02-11 22:19:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Not sure what to do about it at this point. We could move that field to >> the end for 10.3, leaving 10.2 as the only ABI-incompatible minor release, >> but I don't know that that really makes things any better than leaving it >> as-is. Somewhere around the dot-two minor release is where uptake of a >> new PG branch starts to become significant, IME, so preserving ABI >> compatibility going forward from 10.2 might be more useful than preserving >> it against 10.0/10.1. > > Yea, I think the damage is done in this case, and we shouldn't make > things even more complicated.
Yeah, lesson learned. Sorry. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
