On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of >>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I >>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join. >> >> +1 >> >> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql > > To that I replied with > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com. > I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time. > Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and > Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it.
done -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
