On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> IOW, I think a fair response to this is "if you're using logrotate with
> Postgres, you're doing it wrong".  That was of some use back before we
> spent so much sweat on the syslogger, but it's not a reasonable setup
> today.
>

A couple of weeks ago a message was posted to general [1] in which I
concluded the desired behavior is not supported natively.  I'm curious
whether better advice than mine can be given ...

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKoQ0XHAy9De1C8gxUWHSW6w5iKcqX03wyWGe_%2Bc8NxJccCBHw%40mail.gmail.com#cakoq0xhay9de1c8gxuwhsw6w5ikcqx03wywge_+c8nxjccc...@mail.gmail.com

David J.

Reply via email to