Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I don't think that's right. For one there's plenty types of DDL where no > such locking exists, consider e.g. composite datums where additional > columns can be added even after such a type is already used by another > table.
Oh, indeed. Never mind the last paragraph. -- Arseny Sher Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
